The evidence is clear: harm reduction saves lives, saves money, and does not enable drug use.
Rather than promoting health of Canadians, drug laws introduced in the early 1900s were meant for social control and aimed at certain groups of people
Rather than being benign tools aimed at promoting the health of Canadians, drug laws introduced in the early 1900s were meant for social control and targeted certain groups of people, including Asian immigrants, people of colour, and Indigenous people.
Harm reduction saves lives and connects people with vital social services, health care, and stability.
Legal regulation would create safer communities for everyone. It would greatly reduce overdose, weaken high-level organized crime, and keep drugs away from youth.
By changing the way we see and frame substance use, we can move towards a system of laws and policies that will prevent harm and death.